Annonce

Réduire
Aucune annonce.

Le bitcoin, une création de la CIA?!

Réduire
X
 
  • Filtre
  • Heure
  • Afficher
Tout nettoyer
nouveaux messages

  • Le bitcoin, une création de la CIA?!

    Un article publié en 1996 par des anonymes décrit la création d'une crypto-monnaie intraçable:

    HOW TO MAKE A MINT: THE CRYPTOGRAPHY OF ANONYMOUS ELECTRONIC CASH


    Laurie Law, Susan Sabett, Jerry Solinas
    National Security Agency Office of Information Security Research and Technology
    Cryptology Division
    18 June 1996

    CONTENTS

    INTRODUCTION

    1. WHAT IS ELECTRONIC CASH?
    1.1 Electronic Payment
    1.2 Security of Electronic Payments
    1.3 Electronic Cash
    1.4 Multiple Spending

    2. A CRYPTOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION
    2.1 Public-Key Cryptographic Tools
    2.2 A Simplified Electronic Cash Protocol
    2.3 Untraceable Electronic Payments
    2.4 A Basic Electronic Cash Protocol

    3. PROPOSED OFF-LINE IMPLEMENTATIONS
    3.1 Including Identifying Information
    3.2 Authentication and Signature Techniques
    3.3 Summary of Proposed Implementations

    4. OPTIONAL FEATURES OF OFF-LINE CASH
    4. 1 Transferability
    4.2 Divisibility

    5. SECURITY ISSUES
    5.1 Multiple Spending Prevention
    5.2 Wallet Observers
    5.3 Security Failures
    5.4 Restoring Traceability

    CONCLUSION

    REFERENCES

    INTRODUCTION


    With the onset of the Information Age, our nation is becoming increasingly dependent upon network communications. Computer-based technology is significantly impacting our ability to access, store, and distribute information. Among the most important uses of this technology is electronic commerce: performing financial transactions via electronic information exchanged over telecommunications lines. A key requirement for electronic commerce is the development of secure and efficient electronic payment systems. The need for security is highlighted by the rise of the Internet, which promises to be a leading medium for future electronic commerce.
    Electronic payment systems come in many forms including digital checks, debit cards, credit cards, and stored value cards. The usual security features for such systems are privacy (protection from eavesdropping), authenticity (provides user identification and message integrity), and nonrepudiation (prevention of later denying having performed a transaction) .
    The type of electronic payment system focused on in this paper is electronic cash. As the name implies, electronic cash is an attempt to construct an electronic payment system modelled after our paper cash system. Paper cash has such features as being: portable (easily carried), recognizable (as legal tender) hence readily acceptable, transferable (without involvement of the financial network), untraceable (no record of where money is spent), anonymous (no record of who spent the money) and has the ability to make "change." The designers of electronic cash focused on preserving the features of untraceability and anonymity. Thus, electronic cash is defined to be an electronic payment system that provides, in addition to the above security features, the properties of user anonymity and payment untraceability..
    In general, electronic cash schemes achieve these security goals via digital signatures. They can be considered the digital analog to a handwritten signature. Digital signatures are based on public key cryptography. In such a cryptosystem, each user has a secret key and a public key. The secret key is used to create a digital signature and the public key is needed to verify the digital signature. To tell who has signed the information (also called the message), one must be certain one knows who owns a given public key. This is the problem of key management, and its solution requires some kind of authentication infrastructure. In addition, the system must have adequate network and physical security to safeguard the secrecy of the secret keys.
    This report has surveyed the academic literature for cryptographic techniques for implementing secure electronic cash systems. Several innovative payment schemes providing user anonymity and payment untraceability have been found. Although no particular payment system has been thoroughly analyzed, the cryptography itself appears to be sound and to deliver the promised anonymity.
    These schemes are far less satisfactory, however, from a law enforcement point of view. In particular, the dangers of money laundering and counterfeiting are potentially far more serious than with paper cash. These problems exist in any electronic payment system, but they are made much worse by the presence of anonymity. Indeed, the widespread use of electronic cash would increase the vulnerability of the national financial system to Information Warfare attacks. We discuss measures to manage these risks; these steps, however, would have the effect of limiting the users' anonymity.
    This report is organized in the following manner. Chapter 1 defines the basic concepts surrounding electronic payment systems and electronic cash. Chapter 2 provides the reader with a high level cryptographic description of electronic cash protocols in terms of basic authentication mechanisms. Chapter 3 technically describes specific implementations that have been proposed in the academic literature. In Chapter 4, the optional features of transferability and divisibility for off-line electronic cash are presented. Finally, in Chapter 5 the security issues associated with electronic cash are discussed.
    The authors of this paper wish to acknowledge the following people for their contribution to this research effort through numerous discussions and review of this paper: Kevin Igoe, John Petro, Steve Neal, and Mel Currie.

    1. WHAT IS ELECTRONIC CASH?


    We begin by carefully defining "electronic cash." This term is often applied to any electronic payment scheme that superficially resembles cash to the user. In fact, however, electronic cash is a specific kind of electronic payment scheme, defined by certain cryptographic properties. We now focus on these properties.

    1.1 Electronic Payment
    The term electronic commerce refers to any financial transaction involving the electronic transmission of information. The packets of information being transmitted are commonly called electronic tokens. One should not confuse the token, which is a sequence of bits, with the physical media used to store and transmit the information.
    We will refer to the storage medium as a card since it commonly takes the form of a wallet-sized card made of plastic or cardboard. (Two obvious examples are credit cards and ATM cards.) However, the "card" could also be, e.g., a computer memory.
    A particular kind of electronic commerce is that of electronic payment. An electronic payment protocol is a series of transactions, at the end of which a payment has been made, using a token issued by a third party. The most common example is that of credit cards when an electronic approval process is used. Note that our definition implies that neither payer nor payee issues the token.l
    The electronic payment scenario assumes three kinds of players:2
    • a payer or consumer, whom we will name Alice.
    • a payee, such as a merchant. We will name the payee Bob.
    • a financial network with whom both Alice and Bob have accounts. We will informally refer to the financial network as the Bank.
    __________
    1 In this sense, electronic payment differs from such systems as prepaid phone cards and subway fare cards, where the token is issued by the payee.
    2 In 4.1, we will generalize this scenario when we discuss transfers.

  • #2
    La suite de l'intégrité de l'article se trouve dans ce lien du MIT: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/cla...nt/nsamint.htm

    Apparemment le NSA qui a publié l'article. La majorité des auteurs sont anonymes.

    Commentaire


    • #3

      La théorie selon laquelle le bitcoin aurait été créé par la CIA est une idée sans fondement et largement considérée comme une théorie du complot. En réalité, le bitcoin a été introduit en 2009 par une personne ou un groupe de personnes se faisant appeler Satoshi Nakamoto. Son développement était motivé par des idéaux de décentralisation financière et de confidentialité, utilisant des concepts de cryptographie et de blockchain.

      Les spéculations entourant le bitcoin sont dues à son potentiel révolutionnaire dans le domaine financier, mais il n'existe aucune preuve crédible soutenant qu'il aurait été créé par la CIA ou toute autre agence gouvernementale. Il est essentiel d'examiner ces théories avec un esprit critique et de rechercher des informations provenant de sources fiables et vérifiées.




      Dernière modification par zek, 17 avril 2024, 00h38.
      Si vous ne trouvez pas une prière qui vous convienne, inventez-la.” Saint Augustin

      Commentaire


      • #4
        Moi je croyais que c'était le Mossad.
        On ne prête qu'au riches, au sens propre comme au sens figuré.

        Commentaire


        • #5
          alibigoud

          Le mossad est un petit annexe de la CIA. Sans l'aide de la CIA, le mossad est rien. Il n'a pu ni prévenir l'attaque du 7 Octobre ni libéré plus de 150 otages.

          les services secrets Occidentaux font le travail et le petit satan mossad qui prend les trophies comme le cas de l'attaque cybernétique contre les installations Iraniennes.

          Commentaire


          • #6
            La théorie selon laquelle le bitcoin aurait été créé par la CIA

            l'article ne parle pas spécifiquement de bitcoin mais de cryptomonnaie. Une sorte de cash électronique intraçable. Selon certains, le programmeur Japonais qui a lancé le bitcoin était un agent du NSA.

            Et ce n'est qu'une spéculation d'ou le point d'intérrogation.

            Peut etre la cryptomonnaie était inventée pour donner cette illusion d'intracabilité à fin de piéger les criminels qui peuvent l'utiliser dans leur blanchiment d'argent.

            Qui peut croire que les États comme les États-Unis, la Chine, le Japon permettent à n'importe qui d'acheter tout ce qu'ils veulent dans le net et le dark web sans traçabilité?

            Selon la CIA, Jim Kong un a volé plus de 700 millions de Bitcoins par piratage et le régime nord coréen continue à imprimer les faux billets du dollar Américain.
            Dernière modification par Issabrahimi, 17 avril 2024, 13h01.

            Commentaire

            Chargement...
            X