A UN meeting has set Britain, the United States and other Western countries against Arab States and Russia in a diplomatic battle over whether the internet should be more regulated.
The United States has talked on an “impasse” and threatened to walk out of the World Conference on International Telecommunications. The meeting, in Dubai, is not due to finish until Friday.
The threat came after the United Arab Emirates tabled proposals to extend the international treaty at the centre of the negotiations to internet. It currently deals mostly with traditional telecoms infrastructure by setting international standards.
The coalition of nations behind the 22-page proposal, which also includes Russia, Saudi Arabia, Algeria and Sudan, wants the updated treaty to explicitly give "governments, the private sector and civil society" a role in internet regulation.
It would also give all 193 countries attending the meeting an equal role overseeing the Domain Name System, which ensures web addresses function properly. It is currently administered by ICANN, a body under contract to the US government.
The US and its allies objected to the introduction of complex new material midway through the conference.
"All of the indicators we have so far is it's something that could be a clear effort to extend the treaty to cover net governance," said Emma Llanso of the Center for Democracy and Technology, which gets funding from Google and other American internet companies.
“What we're seeing is governments putting forward their visions of the future of the Internet, and if we see a large group of governments form that sees an Internet a lot more locked down and controlled, that's a big concern.”
Ahead of the meeting, Google publicly complained that the freedom of the internet was under threat. It is particularly worried by proposals that could introduce “sender pays” charges for internet traffic, meaning it would have to pay telecoms firms for connecting people to services such as YouTube.
Terry Kramer, the US ambassador to the meeting, said in a video posted online on Sunday that giving governments more sway over internet firms could damage free speech, however.
“It creates an open door for review of content and potential censorship there, it will create a chilling environment for the internet,” he said.
“Right now it feels like we are at an impasse because there are philosophical differences.”
Other observers have suggested the alleged threat is overblown, as the UN agency holding the conference has pledge the final treaty must be agreed by all sides.
Source Telegraph
The United States has talked on an “impasse” and threatened to walk out of the World Conference on International Telecommunications. The meeting, in Dubai, is not due to finish until Friday.
The threat came after the United Arab Emirates tabled proposals to extend the international treaty at the centre of the negotiations to internet. It currently deals mostly with traditional telecoms infrastructure by setting international standards.
The coalition of nations behind the 22-page proposal, which also includes Russia, Saudi Arabia, Algeria and Sudan, wants the updated treaty to explicitly give "governments, the private sector and civil society" a role in internet regulation.
It would also give all 193 countries attending the meeting an equal role overseeing the Domain Name System, which ensures web addresses function properly. It is currently administered by ICANN, a body under contract to the US government.
The US and its allies objected to the introduction of complex new material midway through the conference.
"All of the indicators we have so far is it's something that could be a clear effort to extend the treaty to cover net governance," said Emma Llanso of the Center for Democracy and Technology, which gets funding from Google and other American internet companies.
“What we're seeing is governments putting forward their visions of the future of the Internet, and if we see a large group of governments form that sees an Internet a lot more locked down and controlled, that's a big concern.”
Ahead of the meeting, Google publicly complained that the freedom of the internet was under threat. It is particularly worried by proposals that could introduce “sender pays” charges for internet traffic, meaning it would have to pay telecoms firms for connecting people to services such as YouTube.
Terry Kramer, the US ambassador to the meeting, said in a video posted online on Sunday that giving governments more sway over internet firms could damage free speech, however.
“It creates an open door for review of content and potential censorship there, it will create a chilling environment for the internet,” he said.
“Right now it feels like we are at an impasse because there are philosophical differences.”
Other observers have suggested the alleged threat is overblown, as the UN agency holding the conference has pledge the final treaty must be agreed by all sides.
Source Telegraph
Commentaire